2017-Ģ��ƵAT-749

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵAT held that there was no evidence before it to support the contention that Ģ��ƵRWA DT erred in law. Ģ��ƵAT upheld the findings of Ģ��ƵRWA DT that there was no evidence that the decision to abolish the Appellant��s post was arbitrary or capricious, motivated by prejudice or extraneous factors, or was flawed by procedural irregularity or error of law. Ģ��ƵAT held that there was evidence of a process that was motivated by budgetary constraints as well as concerns about the effective management of a redundancy process. Ģ��ƵAT found no procedural irregularity or any error in law on the part of Ģ��ƵRWA DT. Ģ��ƵAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Ģ��ƵRWA DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to abolish her post and declare her provisionally redundant. Ģ��ƵRWA DT concluded that there was a genuine redundancy situation. Ģ��ƵRWA DT was of the view that evaluating staff members on previous and current performance was reasonable under the special circumstances of the case and rejected the Applicant��s contention that her evaluation was unfair. Ģ��ƵRWA DT dismissed the application.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Ayoub

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement