2020-Ģ��ƵAT-991

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵAT held that Ģ��ƵDT did not commit any errors of law or fact in finding that the applications were not receivable ratione materiae. Ģ��ƵAT held that the Local Salary Survey Committee (LSSC) does not constitute a technical body and therefore does not exempt the Appellants from the mandatory first step of requesting a management evaluation. Ģ��ƵAT dismissed the appeals and affirmed the Ģ��ƵDT judgments.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicants wished to contest a salary survey which led to a downward salary revision. Ģ��ƵDT rejected the applications as not receivable ratione materiae because the Appellants failed to request a management evaluation before applying to Ģ��ƵDT.

Legal Principle(s)

It is the Secretary-General��s prerogative whether to waive the requirement for a request for management evaluation; the Tribunals have no authority in this regard.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Thomas et al.

Entity

Case Number(s)