Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
The Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that ABD¡¯s appeal was filed within 60 days of the Order¡¯s issuance, but more than 30 days after that event. Given that under Article 7(1)(c) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute, a party has 30 days to appeal an order, ABD was out of time to appeal against the impugned Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Order.
The Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal as not receivable.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Former staff member requested the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT to redact certain paragraphs of a Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Judgment which they contended contained sensitive personal information.
In an Order issued on 4 September 2024, the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT granted in part the redaction request.
On 3 November 2024, the former staff member appealed.
Legal Principle(s)
For a case to be receivable, which goes to the issue of jurisdiction, the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT should have jurisdiction, as only then is it empowered to consider and decide the merits thereof.
The Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT has no power in law to consider an appeal from an order if the appeal is out of time and there has been no request for waiver of or other adjustment to this limitation period, or the disclosure of exceptional circumstances why there should be a waiver.