2026-Ģ��ƵAT-1638

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The Ģ��ƵAT held that any dissatisfaction with the meaning of a judgment should be raised in an appeal of the substantive judgment. Mr. Odat did not appeal the underlying judgment, Judgment No. Ģ��ƵRWA/DT/2025/001.

The Ģ��ƵAT found that the Ģ��ƵRWA DT��s subsequent judgment on his application for interpretation was not a fresh judgment within the scope of Article 2 of the Appeals Tribunal Statute, and thus Mr. Odat��s appeal was not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Former Ģ��ƵRWA staff member contested the decision of the Ģ��ƵRWA Dispute Tribunal to dismiss his application for interpretation of Judgment No. Ģ��ƵRWA/DT/2025/001 concerning the disciplinary measure of separation from service without termination indemnity.

In Judgment No. Ģ��ƵRWA/DT/2025/021 the Ģ��ƵRWA DT found the application for interpretation inadmissible on the grounds that the underlying judgment was sufficiently clear and unambiguous, and that Mr. Odat��s request effectively sought to relitigate matters already adjudicated.

Mr. Odat appealed.

Legal Principle(s)

A request for interpretation of a judgment is not an avenue for review or the basis for a fresh judgment.

If the judgment which is the subject of an application for interpretation is sufficiently clear, or if the Applicant is seeking, in a disguised way, to have the case retried, such an application should be dismissed.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Khaleel Odat

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement