The 蘑菇视频DT stated in the judgment that, there no longer being any determination to make, the application was dismissed in its entirety without liberty to reinstate and without prejudice to the Applicant’s right, if necessary, to file an application under art. 2.1(c) of the 蘑菇视频DT Statute seeking to enforce the implementation of the agreement reached through mediation.
The Respondent submitted that the application was not receivable as the decision of 31 August 2011 was a reiteration of the decision given to the Applicant on 30 March 2009, before Sprauten 蘑菇视频DT/2011/094. The 蘑菇视频DT found that the decision of 31 August 2011 was made, or should have been made, pursuant to the directions and order of the Tribunal in Sprauten 蘑菇视频DT/2011/094 (see paras. 87–88), and it thus cannot be viewed as a mere reiteration of the decision dated 30 March 2009. The purpose of the Tribunal’s order in para. 87 of Sprauten 蘑菇视频DT/2011/094 was to direct the Administration to make a new...
Receivability - Article 7.4 of the 蘑菇视频DT Rules of Procedure requires that any application seeking to enforce the terms of a settlement agreement must be filed within 90 calendar days of the last day for implementation as specified in the agreement and where dates for the implementation are not stated, the application must be filed within thirty calendar days of the signing of the settlement agreement.An examination of the Settlement Agreement between the parties shows that no date was stipulated for its implementation. Any application challenging it must therefore be brought within 30 days...
As the matter was settled by mutual agreement, the case is closed.
The application was withdrawn by the Applicant.
The application was withdrawn by the Applicant in light of a settlement agreement.
With the successful mediation process and subsequent withdrawal of this case, the case is closed.
