蘑菇视频

Article 11

  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 12
  • Article 12.2
  • Article 13
  • Article 13.1
  • Article 13.2
  • Article 13.3
  • Article 13.5
  • Article 14
  • Article 25
  • Article 29
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 3.4
  • Article 3.5
  • Article 30
  • Article 4.4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6.1
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.2
    • Showing 1 - 2 of 2
    2022-蘑菇视频AT-1283, Ahlam Allari, Khalil Mohammad Khalaf, Rawan Hussein

    As regards the request for an oral hearing, the 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频RWA DT had lawfully exercised its discretion and given a reasonable explanation for not holding an oral hearing. The 蘑菇视频RWA DT correctly determined that the comprehensive documentary evidence before it was sufficient to render a decision without the need for an oral hearing, especially as the issue was one of receivability. Further, the appellants have not shown how the denial of the request to hold an oral hearing affected the Judgment. With respect to the issue of receivability, the 蘑菇视频AT agreed with the 蘑菇视频RWA DT and upheld...

    2017-蘑菇视频AT-779, Abu Hweidi et al.

    Ar蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT’s decision not to hold an oral hearing was a shortcoming since the parties had not agreed to the case being decided on the papers and the facts needed to be established by witnesses and/or further documentary evidence. On the question of bias and its possible bearing on the outcome of the selection process, 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT should have engaged in a thorough examination of the facts, rather than drawing an inference. 蘑菇视频AT held that the inference drawn by 蘑菇视频RWA DT, that it was realistic to conclude that not all of the posts could be filled by suitable candidates...