蘑菇视频

Article 8.3

  • Article 10
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10(4)
  • Article 10(5)(a)
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11(4)
  • Article 11(5)
  • Article 12.1
  • Article 12.3
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 3
  • Article 4.7
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)
  • Article 8.1(d)(ii)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.2
    • Showing 11 - 12 of 12
    2014-蘑菇视频AT-406, Chahrour

    On the issue of receivability, 蘑菇视频AT held that there was no merit to the Appellant’s claim that 蘑菇视频RWA DT had exceeded its competence or jurisdiction in summarily addressing sua sponte the issue of the receivability of the application when the Commissioner-General did not raise that issue in his reply. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant’s request for review of the contested decision was filed almost a year after he knew of the implied decision and was, therefore, untimely. 蘑菇视频AT rejected the Appellant’s contentions against the participation of the Commissioner-General in the proceedings and to file a...

    2015-蘑菇视频AT-514, Abu Nada

    蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT correctly determined that it did not have jurisdiction to review the decision to suspend him without pay. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT was alert to the injury which the prolonged delay caused the Appellant. On the Appellant’s complaint that 蘑菇视频RWA DT did not address his complaint regarding the deduction by 蘑菇视频RWA from his personal Provident Fund contributions upon his dismissal, apparently, to recoup an overpayment, 蘑菇视频AT held that there was no merit in the complaint and the Appellant failed to demonstrate any error of law or fact on the part of the 蘑菇视频RWA DT when it determined these...