蘑菇视频

CF/AI/2013-001/Amend 2

  • CF/AI/1996-006
  • CF/AI/1997-007
  • CF/AI/2000-025
  • CF/AI/2005/017
  • CF/AI/2007-007
  • CF/AI/2009-004
  • CF/AI/2009-005
  • CF/AI/2009-009
  • CF/AI/2010-001
  • CF/AI/2011-001
  • CF/AI/2011-001/Amend.2
  • CF/AI/2013-001/Amend 2
  • CF/AI/2014-002
  • CF/AI/2014-002/Amend.1
  • CF/AI/2016-005
  • CF/EXD/2013-004
    • Showing 1 - 2 of 2
    2017-蘑菇视频AT-795, Rehman

    蘑菇视频AT agreed with 蘑菇视频DT that the application was moot as the Appellant had already received the relief she requested, namely, the repetition of the selection exercise and her participation in it. 蘑菇视频AT found no reason to differ from 蘑菇视频DT’s approach. 蘑菇视频AT supported 蘑菇视频DT’s recommendation that tests be protected against the possibility of editing or alteration and further recommended that the Organisation strictly complied with its legal framework, particularly with respect to not entrusting staff functions to consultants and/or individual contractors. 蘑菇视频AT suggested that 蘑菇视频DT and the Registries...

    蘑菇视频DT/2017/019, Rehman

    Full and fair consideration: In the absence of concrete, convincing evidence, the mere fact that it is possible, theoretically, to alter/tamper a written test will not suffice for the Tribunal to conclude that an Applicant’s candidature was not given full and fair consideration. Also, where no one of the people involved in the administration of the test had a motive to manipulate it, the Tribunal will not find that the decision had been influenced by extraneous factors. The burden of proof in these matters lies on the Applicant. Good management practice: The Administration should take measures...