蘑菇视频

Regulation 14.8

  • Regulation 14.7
  • Regulation 14.8
  • Regulation 15.2
  • Rule 111.11(b)(ii)
  • Rule 114.12
  • Rule 114.14(a)
    • Showing 1 - 2 of 2
    2013-蘑菇视频AT-334, Konate

    蘑菇视频AT held that, whilst not all the allegations of misconduct with which the staff member was charged were proven, it was established by 蘑菇视频DT that the Appellant failed to apply formal methods of solicitation in respect of contracts, in violation of 蘑菇视频FPA Financial Regulations, Rules and Procurement Procedures and also failed to refer a contract to the 蘑菇视频FPA Headquarters Contracts Review Committee, in violation of further norms. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant had not established any errors of fact or law warranting reversal of the impugned judgment. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT correctly declined to accept...

    2019-蘑菇视频AT-976, Ganbold

    蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT had committed various errors of law, fact, and procedure. 蘑菇视频AT held that the whole reasoning of 蘑菇视频DT was misconstrued and 蘑菇视频DT did not properly examine the lawfulness of the disciplinary sanction. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant awarded and signed a contract on behalf of 蘑菇视频FPA, that she did not conduct any market research or consider other suppliers before doing so, that she had no authority to sign the contract and that she was involved in procurement activities in relation to another 蘑菇视频FPA vendor. Further, 蘑菇视频AT held that there was...