2018-蘑菇视频AT-850, Zama
蘑菇视频AT considered the appeal. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant was estopped from challenging the lawfulness of the reassignment decision made in 2012 because his application to 蘑菇视频DT only challenged the decision to terminate his appointment in 2014. 蘑菇视频AT agreed with 蘑菇视频DT’s holding that there was no nexus between the reassignment and the abolition of the Appellant’s post. 蘑菇视频AT also agreed with 蘑菇视频DT’s finding that 蘑菇视频FPA fulfilled its duties towards the Appellant and had no obligation to place him on a new post. 蘑菇视频AT denied the Appellant’s request to overturn the impugned judgment on the sole ground of...