2013-蘑菇视频AT-384, McCluskey
蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT did not commit any error when it determined that the application before it was not receivable as it was time-barred. 蘑菇视频AT noted that it was technically improper for 蘑菇视频DT to analyse the merits of the case after declaring the application time-barred. 蘑菇视频AT held that even if the appeal had been receivable ratione temporis, the Appellant’s claim could not succeed. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant merely made statements and referred to facts that were not timely contested, without providing any evidence or contesting the reasoning of the first instance judgment. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the...