Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT did not commit any error when it determined that the application before it was not receivable as it was time-barred. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that it was technically improper for Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT to analyse the merits of the case after declaring the application time-barred. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that even if the appeal had been receivable ratione temporis, the Appellant¡¯s claim could not succeed. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Appellant merely made statements and referred to facts that were not timely contested, without providing any evidence or contesting the reasoning of the first instance judgment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to make a previously offered option of an agreed separation with indemnities available to him. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT concluded that the application was not receivable as it was time-barred and his application lacked merit.
Legal Principle(s)
It is improper for Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT to consider the merits of a case after finding it time-barred.