588 (2024), Martin Akerman
- Appealed
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the staff member’s motion for recusal of the 蘑菇视频AT Registrar had no merit. The 蘑菇视频AT noted that the decision to administratively close the case had been taken by the 蘑菇视频AT President and communicated to the parties as such by the 蘑菇视频AT Registrar in her letter. The 蘑菇视频AT found that it followed from the administrative closure of a case that parties no longer had the right to access the Court Case Management System under the case number in question. The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频AT Registrar’s decisions to reject as manifestly inadmissible the staff member’s filings following the case...