蘑菇视频

Delay

  • Access to justice
  • Delay
  • Investigation
  • Right to a hearing
  • Right to comment/respond
  • Right to confront complainant
  • Right to cross-examine witnesses
  • Fact-finding investigation
  • Scope of investigation
    • Showing 1 - 3 of 3
    2025-蘑菇视频AT-1599, Faten Hatem Al Dawoud

    The 蘑菇视频AT held that the appeal was timely, as Article 11(5) of the 蘑菇视频RWA DT Statute provides that the filing period begins upon receipt of the Arabic translation of the judgment when the application was originally submitted in Arabic. Since Ms. Al Dawoud received the Arabic version on 9 January 2025 and filed her appeal on 10 March 2025, the appeal was timely.

    On the merits, the 蘑菇视频AT found that the 蘑菇视频RWA DT correctly identified the Agency’s error in treating an email shared by Ms. Al Dawoud as confidential and acknowledged the harm caused by the erroneous disciplinary measure. However, the 蘑菇视频AT...

    2025-蘑菇视频AT-1594, Ismail Mahmoud Awadat

    The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频RWA Dispute Tribunal did not err in concluding that the former staff member’s misconduct was established and that the disciplinary measure of separation from service, with compensation in lieu of notice and without termination indemnity, was proportionate under the Agency’s regulatory framework. The 蘑菇视频AT emphasized that fraud and collusive practices are considered areas of high concern and that misconduct committed by a person in a position of trust, such as a member of the Provident Fund Loans Committee, warrants a severe sanction.

    The 蘑菇视频AT further held that the 蘑菇视频RWA...

    2025-蘑菇视频AT-1561, HUDA HANNINA

    The 蘑菇视频AT observed that the 蘑菇视频DT did not err in denying the staff member’s request for an oral hearing as the case record was “comprehensive” and there was “no irreconcilable dispute of facts between the parties.”

    The 蘑菇视频AT held that the staff member’s placement on ALWP was justified, given that the staff member was provided with the names of the members of the fact-finding panel assigned to investigate her alleged misconduct, and that she was in a position to approve the consultancy contract of one of those members, which created a conflict of interest and a genuine risk of interference in the...