Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held, noting that the Appellant relied on the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Rosca jurisprudence (judgment No. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT/2009/052) in her request for Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT to waive the time limits for management evaluation, that the plain language of Article 8. 3 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute could not be disregarded. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT approved judgment No. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT/2009/051 as the law on this issue and disapproved the interpretation of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT in Rosca. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant sought an extension of the time limit for her appeal regarding compensation for overtime. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT rejected her application on the grounds that she did not file it within two months of the receipt of the impugned decision, rather she waited almost a year to do so. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT held that it had no jurisdiction to waive the time limits for requests for management evaluation or requests for administrative review.
Legal Principle(s)
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT has no jurisdiction to waive the time limits for requests for management evaluation or requests for administrative review.