Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Appellant was caught in the transition between the old and new internal justice systems. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that the Appellant had requested an extension of the time limit to file an application with the former Administrative Tribunal and that it was questionable if anyone could have granted an extension since the new Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT had not officially started and the former Administrative Tribunal was winding down. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT, therefore, held that the case should be remanded to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT for consideration on merits. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT upheld the appeal, vacated the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment, and remanded the case to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT for a hearing on the merits.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to select her for the position of Director of the Office for Economic and Social Council Support and Coordination. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT issued its judgment No. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT/2009/026. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT concluded that the application had not been submitted on a timely basis and rejected it as time-barred. The Applicant requested revision of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment No. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT/2009/026. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT issued judgment No. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT/2009/087, rejecting the Applicant¡¯s request for revision.
Legal Principle(s)
Left deliberately blank