Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2010-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-081

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT erred in failing to consider adequately the Appellant¡¯s evidence, noting she was not given the opportunity to prove her case, including allegations of discrimination, at the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT hearing, which included the opportunity to call evidence and to challenge the Administration¡¯s evidence. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT erred in law in allowing testimony to be given at the hearing that was neither sworn, affirmed, nor made under a promise, to tell the truth. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT allowed the appeal, set aside the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment and ordered reinstatement or the award of compensation in lieu of reinstatement in the amount of two years¡¯ net base salary.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to renew her appointment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT rejected the application.

Legal Principle(s)

Testimony should not be admitted that was given without any promise, affirmation, or oath to tell the truth.

Outcome

Appeal granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.