Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2010-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-088

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT was correct to find that it was not competent to consider the application as far as it concerned the decision not to award Ms Megerditchian a service contract since such contracts were awarded to non-staff members. However, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT erred in receiving the application in respect of a service contract. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT erred in its interpretation of the term priority consideration and that a promise of priority consideration in a job application did not by itself give rise to a legal right on the part of Ms Megerditchian. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT erred in finding that the Administration caused harm to Ms Megerditchian. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT allowed the appeal, rescinded the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment and vacated the award of damages.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Ms Megerditchian contested the non-renewal of her service contract. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT found partly for Ms Megerditchian and awarded compensation.

Legal Principle(s)

Priority consideration cannot be interpreted as a promise or guarantee to be appointed or to receive that for which one is considered in priority.

Outcome

Appeal granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Megerditchian
Case Number(s)
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type