2010-Ģ��ƵAT-098

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. Ģ��ƵAT preliminarily held that the appeal was receivable, in accordance with Article 7(1)(a) of the Ģ��ƵAT RoP. Ģ��ƵAT noted that, although not all allegations of misconduct against Mr Masri were proved, some of the allegations were sufficiently supported by the evidence. Ģ��ƵAT held that the evidence established that Mr Masri met vendors at his home outside working hours and discussed Ģ��Ƶ Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUC) contracts, he received the benefit of interest-free loans from two vendors, and he gave assistance to a vendor in connection with its technical proposal for a catering contract with MONUC. Ģ��ƵAT held that this conduct violated a number of the Financial and Staff Regulations and amounted to serious misconduct. Ģ��ƵAT held that the disciplinary measure of summary dismissal adopted in this case was proportionate to the misconduct. Ģ��ƵAT upheld the appeal, affirmed the administrative decision imposing the disciplinary measure of summary dismissal, and reversed the Ģ��ƵDT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Mr Masri contested his summary dismissal. Ģ��ƵDT found that the Secretary-General failed to substantiate the disciplinary charges against Mr Masri to the required standard of proof and that the sanction of summary dismissal was disproportionate. Ģ��ƵDT rescinded the decision to summarily dismiss Mr Masri and ordered the Secretary-General to reinstate Mr Masri and pay his lost earnings with interest. Ģ��ƵDT ordered that Mr Masri be demoted by four steps within his job level at the time of his summary dismissal and that he be paid fixed compensation, should the Secretary-General decide not to perform the obligation to rescind the decision.

Legal Principle(s)

Staff members exercising procurement functions are required to conduct themselves, from an objective standpoint, in an impartial and honest way and act only in the interests of the Ģ��Ƶ. To comply with this duty, staff members must be seen to act with integrity, obtain no personal benefit from third parties and not engage in any conduct which could create the impression of favouring third parties; they must be and appear to be above reproach, particularly when interacting with persons or entities who could potentially become involved in supplying goods or services to the Organisation, or are currently in such a relationship, like vendors.

Outcome

Appeal granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Masri

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement