Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2011-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-126

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered an application for revision of Judgment No. 1465 of the former Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Administrative Tribunal submitted by Mr Lesar. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that General Assembly resolution 63/253 was silent on the question of revision of judgments handed down by the former Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Administrative Tribunal during the period prior to its abolishment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the omission did not constitute a denial of the right to an effective remedy since a tribunal had already dispensed justice. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that it was not competent to revise the former Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Administrative Tribunal Judgment and that therefore, the application was not receivable. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the application.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Mr Lesar contested the decision to inform the Austrian authorities that he was the subject of an investigation. In Judgment No. 1465 Applicant (2009), the former Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Administrative Tribunal rejected Mr Lesar¡¯s appeal.

Legal Principle(s)

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT does not have the authority to revise judgments handed down by the former Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Administrative Tribunal. Only the court that handed down a decision has the power to revise it unless a rule of law determines to transfer it to another court.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Lesar
Case Number(s)
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type