Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that it was satisfied that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT¡¯s conclusion that Ms Frechon was incapable of further service, based on the findings of the Medical Board, was not tantamount to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT having stepped into the shoes of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Medical Director. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that there were no grounds to disagree with the finding of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT that Ms Frechon¡¯s contract was, in fact, terminated for medical reasons. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the procedure which should have been invoked was that set out in ST/AI/1999/16. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT was correct in rescinding the decision to terminate Ms Frechon¡¯s employment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT upheld the Order reinstating Ms Frechon but changed it to an Order to reinstate Ms Frechon for the purpose of the Administration initiating the procedures pursuant to ST/AI/1999/16. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT adjusted the way in which interest on the compensation awarded should be calculated. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment with the above-noted variances to the Orders contained therein.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Ms Frechon contested the decision not to renew her fixed-term appointment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT found for Ms Frechon, reinstating her and awarding her compensation.
Legal Principle(s)
A fixed-term appointment has no expectancy of renewal. An exception to the rules governing the expiry of a fixed-term contract will arise if the administrative decision not to renew is based on improper motives or if there are countervailing circumstances.