Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2011-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-132

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that it was satisfied that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT¡¯s conclusion that Ms Frechon was incapable of further service, based on the findings of the Medical Board, was not tantamount to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT having stepped into the shoes of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Medical Director. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that there were no grounds to disagree with the finding of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT that Ms Frechon¡¯s contract was, in fact, terminated for medical reasons. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the procedure which should have been invoked was that set out in ST/AI/1999/16. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT was correct in rescinding the decision to terminate Ms Frechon¡¯s employment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT upheld the Order reinstating Ms Frechon but changed it to an Order to reinstate Ms Frechon for the purpose of the Administration initiating the procedures pursuant to ST/AI/1999/16. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT adjusted the way in which interest on the compensation awarded should be calculated. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment with the above-noted variances to the Orders contained therein.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Ms Frechon contested the decision not to renew her fixed-term appointment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT found for Ms Frechon, reinstating her and awarding her compensation.

Legal Principle(s)

A fixed-term appointment has no expectancy of renewal. An exception to the rules governing the expiry of a fixed-term contract will arise if the administrative decision not to renew is based on improper motives or if there are countervailing circumstances.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.