Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that the parties freely made an agreement, the Appellant received benefits under it and then she sought additional benefits on the basis that she had not received proper notice. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that, as Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT found, the Appellant received notice of her termination date when she signed the MOU, some four months prior. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the fact that a formal letter was received later neither abrogated the MOU nor gave rise to any further compensation. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT found no error in the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT correctly determined that the Appellant was not entitled to compensation in lieu of notice under the MOU as she had received a notice and had given up her right to contest her termination in the MOU. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant, having entered into an MOU with the Administration for an agreed termination, then sought compensation in lieu of notice for the termination. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT dismissed the application.
Legal Principle(s)
A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by a staff member will normally be enforced.