Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2011-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-156

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Appellant was essentially seeking an amendment to the Regulations of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJPSF in such a way as to enable her benefit to be paid retroactively to the date of the death in service of her husband, which was prior to 1 April 1999. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the criteria proposed by the Appellant to pay the benefit were not in force to be applied to her case. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF correctly applied the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF Regulations. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the impugned decision.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to modify her benefit as a divorced surviving spouse. The Standing Committee of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPB upheld the decision.

Legal Principle(s)

Only the General Assembly can amend Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF Regulations.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

Outcome Extra Text

No relief ordered; No relief ordered.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Taylor
Case Number(s)
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type