Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2011-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-157

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the appeal was not receivable because it was not filed within the deadline. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that there were no exceptional circumstances for it to waive the time limits. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT was not persuaded that the Appellant did not receive the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment or any notification of the judgment, as he had actual knowledge of the judgment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Appellant¡¯s right to due process of law was not violated. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the appeal was not receivable as it was time-barred. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the non-renewal of his contract. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT rejected the application.

Legal Principle(s)

An appeal that is not filed within the time limits will not be receivable by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT in the absence of exceptional circumstances.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Onana
Entity
Case Number(s)
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type