Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵ

Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT considered appeals of judgment Nos. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT/2010/075 and Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT/2010/076. On the issue of being barred from the Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵOV premises, Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT noted that Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT has jurisdiction over applications filed by a staff member, former staff member or a person making claims in the name of an incapacitated or deceased staff member. However, given that the Appellant was not a staff member at the time he was barred, Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT held that he could not complain that the decision was not in compliance with his terms of appointment or contract of employment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT held that, as a holder of an SSA contract, the Appellant was no longer on that date subject to the Staff Regulations and Rules and the barring could not have adversely affected his terms of appointment as a former staff member. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT correctly rejected the application as not receivable ratione personae. On the issue of access to documents, Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT held that while the Appellant, as a former staff member, was entitled to have access to his files that correspond to the period of his former employment with Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵOV, since the reasons for gaining access related to a decision which had no bearing on his status as a former staff member, Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT correctly held that the application was not receivable. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT dismissed the appeals and affirmed both Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT judgments.