蘑菇视频AT Held or 蘑菇视频DT Pronouncements
蘑菇视频AT considered the Appellant’s appeal. 蘑菇视频AT noted that the established facts showed that the Appellant’s negligence as Head Storekeeper facilitated the misconduct of other staff members and his negligence was evidenced by the excess of merchandise in the storeroom under his control, and by his failure to keep an inventory of the items in his custody. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant neither successfully rebutted these facts, nor demonstrated any flaws in the administrative and disciplinary procedures. 蘑菇视频AT held that the sanction of demotion was lawful. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Commissioner-General’s decision.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
蘑菇视频RWA decision: The Applicant contested the disciplinary measures of demotion and transfer to another location. The Joint Appeals Board (JAB) found that the Applicant’s demotion was disproportionate and recommended that the Commissioner-General review this decision. The Commissioner-General rejected the recommendation.
Legal Principle(s)
When reviewing a disciplinary sanction imposed by the Administration, the role of the Tribunal is to examine whether the facts on which the sanction is based have been established, whether the established facts constitute misconduct, and whether the sanction is proportionate to the offence.
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
No relief ordered; No relief ordered.