Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered Mr El Khatib¡¯s application for revision of judgment No. 2011-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-142. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Mr El Khatib did not identify any fact unknown at the time of the impugned judgment which could justify its review. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that what he actually sought was a discussion of the amount of compensation awarded to him, an option not granted by the Statute. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the petition did not meet the statutory requirements. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the application for revision.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Mr El Khatib had contested the abolition of his post and the delay in payment of salary increments. On appeal, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that he had not been properly treated and awarded compensation in the amount of three months¡¯ net base salary.
Legal Principle(s)
Any application which seeks review of a final judgment rendered by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT can only succeed if it fulfils the strict and exceptional criteria established by Article 11 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute.
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
Only financial compensation; Only financial compensation.