Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that appeals from Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT decisions on suspensions of action will only be receivable if Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT, in adjudicating such applications, exceeded its competence or jurisdiction. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT¡¯s legal and factual reasoning fell entirely within its competence and jurisdiction. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that, although the Appellant¡¯s claims addressed the merits of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment, they did not amount to claims that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT exceeded its competence or jurisdiction. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the appeal was not receivable. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT dismissed the appeal.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant requested a suspension of action for a selection decision, after not having been selected for a post. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT rejected the application on the ground that the selection decision had already been implemented before a judgment on suspension of action could be rendered.
Legal Principle(s)
Appeals from Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT decisions on suspensions of action will only be receivable if Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT, in adjudicating such applications, exceeded its competence or jurisdiction.