Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2011-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-131 by Ms Cohen. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that none of the grounds for revision set forth by Ms Cohen met the requirements of Article 11(1) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute or Article 24 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Rules of Procedure. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that none of the grounds provided were new facts, but rather they were new legal arguments and an attempt by Ms Cohen to re-litigate her case and complain about Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT reducing the compensation awarded. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the application for revision.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
In judgment No. 2011-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-131, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT reduced the amount of compensation for pecuniary damages for loss of earnings and amended the amount of interest awarded.
Legal Principle(s)
No party may seek revision of a judgment merely because that party is dissatisfied with the pronouncement of the Tribunal and wants to have a second round of litigation.