Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered two appeals, one by Ms S. Nourain and one by Ms A Nourain, against judgment No. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT/2012/142. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed Ms A. Nourain¡¯s appeal as she was not a party to the proceedings and had no standing to appeal. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the facts were not disputed; the misconduct had been established and so had its seriousness. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that it could not say that the sanction of dismissal was unfair or disproportionate to the seriousness of the offences. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal of Ms A Nourain as not receivable and the appeal of Ms S. Nourain on the merits.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment: The Applicants, sisters, contested the decisions to separate them from service. Ms S. Nourain had made a material omission in her Personal History Profile (PHP) by failing to disclose that her sister also worked for African Union-United Nations Hybrid Operation in Darfur (Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAMID) and she failed to respond to the investigator¡¯s requests for information. Of the two sisters, only Ms S. Nourain filed an application with Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT rejected her application.
Legal Principle(s)
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT will not substitute its own judgment for that of the competent decision-maker.