Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General limited to the matter of compensation. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT held that the appeal had to be allowed in part because Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT erred in setting the compensation in lieu of reinstatement at two years¡¯ net base salary without considering that Mr Gakumba¡¯s previous fixed-term appointments were one year each. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT held that the expectancy of renewal could not be fixed beyond such a period and therefore reduced the compensation to one year¡¯s net base salary. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT judgment on compensation for non-pecuniary damages and held that no error of law was committed, since the circumstances of the case allowed the inference that the claimant suffered relevant harm, noting that, as the President of the Staff Association, the Appellant was essentially subjected to a termination that was illegally couched as Special Leave With Full Pay, arbitrarily graded and denied a renewal of his fixed-term appointment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT held that those circumstances supported the finding of humiliation, embarrassment, and negative impact of the Administration¡¯s wrongdoing on the staff member, which led Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT to award the reasonable amount of seven months¡¯ net base salary as compensation. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT allowed the appeal in part and reduced the award of compensation in lieu of reinstatement ordered by Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT to one year¡¯s net base salary.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT judgment: The Applicant contested the decision not to renew his contract. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT found that the Applicant¡¯s application in respect of his termination was not receivable as he had failed to challenge the decision to terminate his service and to deny him access to his workplace. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT also found due process and procedural violations in respect of the Applicant¡¯s performance evaluations, and abuse of authority on the part of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDP Resident Representative in respect of the non-renewal of the Applicant¡¯s fixed term appointment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT ordered rescission of the decision not to renew, and the Applicant¡¯s reinstatement or, in the alternative, two years¡¯ net base salary in lieu of reinstatement. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT awarded the Applicant an additional 7 months¡¯ net base salary in compensation for procedural and due process violations, humiliation and embarrassment.
Legal Principle(s)
In setting compensation in lieu of reinstatement, the length of the previous appointment is relevant as the expectancy of renewal should not be fixed beyond such a period or else it would not be reasonable.