2014-Ģ��ƵAT-441

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The Appellant filed a notice of withdrawal pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement. Ģ��ƵAT issued Order No. 188 (2014) noting the withdrawal and ordering the Registrar to close the case.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Ģ��ƵDT judgment: The Applicant contested the decision not to grant him a permanent appointment. Ģ��ƵDT issued judgment No. Ģ��ƵDT/2013/073 dismissing the application.

Legal Principle(s)

A party may withdraw an appeal simply by giving notice and need not necessarily provide any further justification.

Outcome

Closed on withdrawal

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Chowdhury

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement