Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2014-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-458

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

As a preliminary matter, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the Appellant¡¯s request for an oral hearing. On the merits, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that he argued the same arguments that he put before Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT found that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT gave careful and fair consideration to the Appellant¡¯s arguments and weighed them against the facts of the case. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT found no fault with Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT¡¯s decision and held that the Appellant did not demonstrate that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT erred in fact or law. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decisions to declare his functions as Trades Instructor, Radio and Television Maintenance redundant and to deny his request to be transferred to the post of Recreation Officer. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT found that no extraneous factors, maladministration and/or breach of due process tainted the contested decision and dismissed the application.

Legal Principle(s)

It is not sufficient for an appellant merely to state that they disagree with the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT¡¯s decision and to repeat the arguments submitted before the first instance court. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT has broad discretion to determine the weight it attaches to the evidence before it. An appellant who appeals a

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.