Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
As a preliminary matter, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the Appellant¡¯s request for an oral hearing. On the merits, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that he argued the same arguments that he put before Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT found that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT gave careful and fair consideration to the Appellant¡¯s arguments and weighed them against the facts of the case. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT found no fault with Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT¡¯s decision and held that the Appellant did not demonstrate that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT erred in fact or law. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decisions to declare his functions as Trades Instructor, Radio and Television Maintenance redundant and to deny his request to be transferred to the post of Recreation Officer. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT found that no extraneous factors, maladministration and/or breach of due process tainted the contested decision and dismissed the application.
Legal Principle(s)
It is not sufficient for an appellant merely to state that they disagree with the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT¡¯s decision and to repeat the arguments submitted before the first instance court. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT has broad discretion to determine the weight it attaches to the evidence before it. An appellant who appeals a