Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
As a preliminary matter, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT denied the Appellant¡¯s request for an oral hearing. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF correctly applied Article 45 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJPSF Regulations and relied on an internationally binding judgment about spousal and child support, issued by an Austrian court, which was not contradicted by the divorce decree issued by a Portuguese court. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT found no error of law or fact such as to vitiate the contested decision and upheld Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF¡¯s ¡°reasoned and well-founded decision.¡± Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJPSB decision.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF to deduct 50 per cent of his monthly pension benefit for payment directly to his former spouse, in accordance with Article 45 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF Regulations. The Standing Committee (or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJPSB) affirmed the decision of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF.
Legal Principle(s)
An appeal before Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT, submitted against a decision adopted by the Standing Committee of the Pension Board, can only succeed if it is found that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJPSF Regulations were not observed.
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
No relief ordered