2014-Ģ��ƵAT-473

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

With regard to the decisions to transfer the Appellant from Ģ��ƵOPS to GF / WHO, to transfer her back to Ģ��ƵOPS and to put her on reimbursable loan to the GF, to deny her the right to return to Ģ��ƵOPS, and to separate her from Ģ��ƵOPS upon the expiry of her SLWOP on 30 June 2012, Ģ��ƵAT found that Ģ��ƵDT did not err in holding that the Appellant��s challenges were time-barred. Ģ��ƵAT held that the Appellant failed to seek timely management evaluation of her separation from Ģ��ƵOPS on 30 June 2012. With respect to Ģ��ƵDT��s determination that the Appellant was not challenging her financial package and that the basis of her claim related to her separation on 30 June 2012, Ģ��ƵAT upheld Ģ��ƵDT��s decision. Ģ��ƵAT noted that the consequences the Appellant sought to impugn were not timely challenged and that she could not rely on the unchallenged consequences to impugn her separation from service on 30 June 2012. Ģ��ƵAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ģ��ƵDT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to separate her from service under a financial package that allegedly did not accurately reflect her contractual status with the Organisation. She also contested the regularity of her transfer from Ģ��ƵOPS to GF / WHO, her transfer back to Ģ��ƵOPS, the reimbursable loan agreement with the Global Fund (GF), as well as the decision to deny her to return to Ģ��ƵOPS upon the expiration of that agreement. Ģ��ƵDT rejected her application ratione temporis with respect to the June 2008 decision to transfer her from Ģ��ƵOPS to the GF, the January 2009 decision to transfer her back to Ģ��ƵOPS and put her on reimbursable loan to the GF, the January 2011 decision to deny her the right to return to Ģ��ƵOPS, and the decision to separate her from Ģ��ƵOPS upon expiry of her Special Leave Without Pay (SLWOP). With respect to the decision to separate the Applicant from service, Ģ��ƵDT found that her request for management evaluation was beyond the 60-day time limit.

Legal Principle(s)

The deadline to submit a request for management evaluation may be extended by the Secretary-General pending efforts for informal resolution conducted by the Office of the Ombudsman, under conditions specified by the Secretary-General.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Collas

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement