Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered Ms Dzuverovic¡¯s Application for Interpretation of judgment, specifically the portion that dismissed the Secretary-General¡¯s cross-appeal to redact the recommendations made by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT and thus allowed them to remain despite the fact that Ms Dzuverovic¡¯s Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT application was not receivable. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that it explained the meaning and scope of its decision to dismiss the Secretary-General¡¯s cross-appeal and not to redact the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT recommendations when it stated that the recommendations had no binding consequences on the parties. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT found that the judgment was not ambiguous and, accordingly, did not admit the application for interpretation.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Ms Dzuverovic contested the decision to not take action on her requests to investigate her allegations of irregularity. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT properly determined that her application was not receivable and dismissed her appeal.
Legal Principle(s)
Left deliberately blank.