Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered two applications, one for correction and one for revision, relating to judgment No. 2013-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-363. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Mr Chaaban failed to show any clerical or arithmetical mistake to justify the correction of the judgment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Mr Chaaban failed to identify any decisive fact unknown at the time of the judgment to warrant its revision. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed both applications.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
In judgment No. 2013-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-363, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT¡¯s time-bar finding. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Mr Chaaban did not allege any special circumstances that had prevented him from submitting a timely application, but argued that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT should have waived the time limit for his application given that it had done so, for a much longer period of time, with respect to the Commissioner-General¡¯s late reply.
Legal Principle(s)
An application seeking review of a final judgment rendered by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT can only succeed it if fulfils the strict and exceptional criteria established under its Statute.