2015-Ģ��ƵAT-524

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

As a preliminary matter, Ģ��ƵAT denied the Appellant��s application to file a reply to the Secretary-General��s answer and her motion to file additional evidence. On the issue of redaction, Ģ��ƵAT held that the Appellant��s concerns were unfounded because the judgments referenced her professional profile only in a general way and did not detail the confidential matters raised by the Appellant in her submission. Ģ��ƵAT agreed with the findings of Ģ��ƵDT that the previous judgment with the Appellant��s name as written had already been in the public domain for a long time and no useful purpose would be served by an order of redaction. Ģ��ƵAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ģ��ƵDT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant requested to withdraw her case and the redaction of all documents related to her case on the Ģ��Ƶ Office of Administration of Justice website, including a previous judgment on Suspension. Ģ��ƵDT accepted the Appellant��s withdrawal of her application on the merits and rejection the Appellant��s request for redaction.

Legal Principle(s)

Redaction is only permitted where it is necessary to protect the information of a confidential and sensitive nature.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Utkina

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement