2015-Ģ��ƵAT-541

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The Appellant appealed the Ģ��ƵRWA DT judgment failure to consider several points and to address compensation. Ģ��ƵAT held that the Appellant did not identify any of the requisite grounds in his appeal. Ģ��ƵAT held that it would not allow new claims to be raised on appeal when the circumstances giving rise to such claims were known to a party at the time and should have been presented to Ģ��ƵRWA DT. Ģ��ƵAT upheld the Ģ��ƵRWA DT��s decision not to award compensation on the basis that there was no evidence in support of the Appellant��s claim of psychological suffering. Ģ��ƵAT held that the Appellant��s case was fully and fairly considered by Ģ��ƵRWA DT. Ģ��ƵAT held that there was no error of law or fact in Ģ��ƵRWA DT��s decision. Ģ��ƵAT held there was no merit in the appeal. Ģ��ƵAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ģ��ƵRWA DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Ģ��ƵRWA DT judgment: The Applicant contested his letter of censure and suspension for one week without pay for misconduct in the form of instigating a student to make a false complaint about another teacher. Ģ��ƵDT found for the Applicant, ordering the withdrawal of the letter of censure and reimbursement of the one week��s salary.

Legal Principle(s)

The need for compensation must be demonstrated by the evidence. Moral damages may not be awarded without specific evidence supporting the claim.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Hasan

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement