Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Mr Kouadio. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that at no point did Mr Kouadio request management evaluation of the contested decision and that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT is prohibited from considering any application brought to it more than three years after the issuance of the administrative decision that a potential applicant is seeking to challenge. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT erred on a question of law in finding that it could not determine the receivability of the application. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT upheld the Secretary-General¡¯s appeal, vacated the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment and dismissed Mr Kouadio¡¯s cross-appeal.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Mr Kouadio contested the non-renewal of his appointment due to the abolition of his post. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT considered that it was unable to take a decision on receivability without the Administration having notified the Applicant in writing. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT ordered the Administration to notify Mr Kouadio in writing.
Legal Principle(s)
Requesting management evaluation is a mandatory first step in the appeals process. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT has no power to suspend or waive the deadlines for management evaluation.