Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered a request for revision of judgment No. 2013-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-297. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that the application for revision was filed more than six months beyond the time limit. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the application for revision was not receivable ratione temporis. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Previous Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT judgment: Mr Likuyani was separated from service without notice after he was found to have filed false claims for reimbursement of medical bills and to have made personal international phone calls from an official line without authorisation. He applied to the former Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Administrative Tribunal for revision of its judgment No. 976, which was transferred to the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT. Mr Likuyani filed an application with Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT for revision of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Administrative Tribunal judgment No. 976. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT found that the application was not receivable. On appeal to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT, in judgment No. 2013-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-297, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT found that the application was not receivable.
Legal Principle(s)
An application for a revision of a judgment must be made within 30 calendar days of the discovery of the fact and within one year of the date of the judgment.