Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2015-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-585

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered a request for revision of judgment No. 2013-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-297. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that the application for revision was filed more than six months beyond the time limit. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the application for revision was not receivable ratione temporis. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Previous Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT judgment: Mr Likuyani was separated from service without notice after he was found to have filed false claims for reimbursement of medical bills and to have made personal international phone calls from an official line without authorisation. He applied to the former Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Administrative Tribunal for revision of its judgment No. 976, which was transferred to the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT. Mr Likuyani filed an application with Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT for revision of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Administrative Tribunal judgment No. 976. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT found that the application was not receivable. On appeal to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT, in judgment No. 2013-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-297, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT found that the application was not receivable.

Legal Principle(s)

An application for a revision of a judgment must be made within 30 calendar days of the discovery of the fact and within one year of the date of the judgment.

Outcome

Revision, correction, interpretation or execution

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.