2016-Ģ��ƵAT-702

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵAT rejected the request for an oral hearing, finding it would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case. Ģ��ƵAT denied the motion seeking leave to file additional pleadings/evidence, finding there were no exceptional circumstances that would warrant the granting of the motion. Ģ��ƵAT held that the appeal on the suspension without pay was not receivable since the Appellant had failed to observe the time limits. Regarding the receivability of the letter requesting reconsideration of the summary dismissal, Ģ��ƵAT held that it would not admit evidence that had been known to the Appellant at the time of the initial trial and could have, with due diligence, been presented to AJAB and ICAO. Ģ��ƵAT held that the acts of misconduct the Appellant admittedly committed, the acceptance of payments from representatives of a Ukrainian business consortium (EDAPS) while being in the employ of ICAO, were indeed very egregious and serious. Ģ��ƵAT held that this type of misconduct is tantamount to a fundamental breach of trust and confidence which goes to the very root of the employment contract and upheld, therefore, the Secretary-General��s exercise of her discretion in imposing the sanction of summary dismissal. Ģ��ƵAT dismissed the appeal was dismissed and affirmed the decision of the ICAO Secretary-General.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

ICAO decision: The Applicant presented an appeal to ICAO��s Advisory Joint Appeals Board (AJAB) advancing several claims in connection with, inter alia, the initial decision to suspend him without pay, the decision to summarily dismiss him, and the refusal to invoke his immunity. AJAB recommended that the appeal should be rejected in its entirety. The ICAO Secretary-General issued a decision accepting the AJAB��s recommendation and rejecting the appeal.

Legal Principle(s)

In accordance with the procedures set out in the Staff Rules, the ICAO Secretary-General may impose disciplinary measures on any staff member engaged in misconduct. He may summarily dismiss a staff member for serious misconduct.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Siciliano

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement