Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2016-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-703

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT rejected the request for an oral hearing since the factual and legal issues arising from the appeal had already been clearly defined. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT found no error in Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT¡¯s judgment that the application was not receivable ratione materiae. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT summary judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to place her on special leave without pay. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT dismissed the application summarily as not receivable ratione materiae since the Applicant had not previously submitted the contested decision to a management evaluation.

Legal Principle(s)

In the absence of a request for management evaluation of the contested decision, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT cannot but declare the application not receivable ratione materiae.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.