2017-Ģ��ƵAT-748

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵAT agreed with Ģ��ƵRWA DT��s finding. Ģ��ƵAT held that no purpose would have been served by the conduct of an evaluation exercise for a post that was about to be or had been abolished. Ģ��ƵAT accepted the Ģ��ƵRWA DT��s finding that there was a genuine redundancy situation. Ģ��ƵAT held that there was no evidence before it to support the Appellant��s contention that Ģ��ƵRWA DT erred in law. Ģ��ƵAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ģ��ƵRWA DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to abolish his post and declare him provisionally redundant. Ģ��ƵRWA DT rejected the Applicant��s procedural challenge that he had not been evaluated before being declared provisionally redundant. Ģ��ƵRWA DT concluded that there was a genuine redundancy situation and dismissed the application.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Sharbaji

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement