Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Appellant had not complied with his obligations under Article 2(1) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that there were no errors of law, fact, or procedure in the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT judgment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that under the relevant Circular, the Administration only had a duty to consider the Appellant¡¯s request to be transferred to a certain compound, but not his wish to be transferred to a certain school located in that compound. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT Judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision to deny his request for a transfer. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT dismissed the case in its entirety.
Legal Principle(s)
The function of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT is to determine if the first instance tribunal has made errors of fact or law, exceeded its jurisdiction or competence, or failed to exercise its jurisdiction, as prescribed in Article 2(1) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. The appellant has the burden of satisfying Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT that the judgment rendered by the first instance tribunal is defective.
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
No relief ordered; No relief ordered.