蘑菇视频AT Held or 蘑菇视频DT Pronouncements
蘑菇视频AT held that in failing to file an appeal brief contesting the decision taken against her, the Appellant did not discharge her burden to demonstrate that the impugned judgment erred on a question of law or fact, resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 蘑菇视频AT noted that there appeared to be an implied administrative decision when the Appellant did not receive any decision on her first written demand in 2011 and that that application also seemed not to be receivable ratione materiae. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 蘑菇视频DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to grant her a Special Post Allowance (SPA). 蘑菇视频DT dismissed her application, finding that the Applicant had failed to make a claim seeking retroactive payment of the SPA in a timely manner. 蘑菇视频DT also addressed the merits of the case, stating that the Applicant had not given evidence to show that she continued to perform all of the high-level functions required to be entitled to such payment.
Legal Principle(s)
An appellant has the burden of satisfying 蘑菇视频AT that the judgment he or she seeks to challenge is defective and the appellant must identify the alleged defects in the judgment and state the grounds relied upon in asserting that the judgment is defective.