Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT rejected the request for an oral hearing since it did not find that an oral hearing would assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Summary judgment, finding that the application was manifestly inadmissible, was not tainted by any errors. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Appellant was asking for the execution of an alleged default judgment issued by the first instance court in the previous proceedings more than six years earlier, and for enforcement of a non-existent mediation agreement. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment: The Applicant filed an application seeking an order for execution of a ¡°Default judgment¡± said to be issued by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT on 14 December 2009 and an order for enforcement of a ¡°Mediation Agreement¡± dated 24 May 2010. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT dismissed the application as manifestly inadmissible.
Legal Principle(s)
A summary judgment may be issued by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT when there is no dispute concerning the facts and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. It can be issued either in response to a party¡¯s request or on the Tribunal¡¯s own initiative.