2019-Ģ��ƵAT-963

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The Applicant filed a second application for interpretation of judgment No. 2017-Ģ��ƵAT-774 and an application for execution of judgment No. 2018-Ģ��ƵAT-827. Subsequently, the Applicant requested leave to withdraw these two applications. Ģ��ƵAT granted leave to withdraw the applications and directed the Registrar to close the cases.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Previous Ģ��ƵAT judgments: In judgment No. 2017-Ģ��ƵAT-774, Ģ��ƵAT held that Ģ��ƵDT did not err in ordering the removal of adverse references to the staff member in meeting minutes and the recirculation of the revised minutes to all recipients to inform them of the findings of the relevant fact-finding panel that there was no basis to support the damaging comments made against the Appellant, Ģ��ƵAT reduced the amount of compensation and vacated the Ģ��ƵDT��s award for procedural error. In judgment No. 2018-Ģ��ƵAT-827, Ģ��ƵAT disposed of an application for interpretation of judgment No. 2017-Ģ��ƵAT-774.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Closed on withdrawal

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Awe

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry