2020-Ģ��ƵAT-1012

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵAT denied the request for an oral hearing, finding it would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case. Ģ��ƵAT held, recalling the Spinardi jurisprudence (judgment No. 2019-Ģ��ƵAT-957), that the decision on the Appellant��s complaints was not made utilizing a neutral first instance process as required jurisdictionally by Article 2. 10 of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Ģ��ƵAT noted that the appealed decision was made by the ICAO Secretary-General whose own earlier decision(s) the Appellant had challenged. Ģ��ƵAT allowed the appeal and set aside the ICAO Secretary-General��s and/or the AJAB��s decision and remanded the case to AJAB for decision in accordance with Article 2.10 of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to appoint her to a post. The ICAO AJAB recommended her appeal be dismissed. The ICAO Secretary-General accepted the ICAO AJAB recommendation and rejected the appeal.

Legal Principle(s)

In order to establish Ģ��ƵAT��s jurisdiction, an agency, Organisation or entity must utilize a neutral first instance process that includes a written record and a written decision. Neither the opinion nor a recommendation of the ICAO Advisory JointAppeals Board (AJAB) or the subsequent ICAO Secretary-General��s decision can be considered a neutral first instance process.

Outcome

Appeal granted

Outcome Extra Text

No relief ordered; No relief ordered.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Heftberger

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement