Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2020-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-1034

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that AJAB¡¯s interim report did not constitute a neutral first instance process which included a written record and a written decision providing reasons, fact and law and as such, did not conform to the requirements of Article 2(10) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute or the Agreement between the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ and ICAO. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that at ICAO there was no neutral first instance process including a decision. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Secretary-General of ICAO, who issued the contested decision, was not neutral, but a party to proceedings. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that under such circumstances it was not satisfied that the essential elements of a neutral first instance process were present to have constituted a decision that could be appealed to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT remanded the case to AJAB for a neutral first instance process producing a binding decision with reasons, a statement of the relevant facts, and the relevant law.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Mr. El Sehemawi contested the decision of the Secretary-General of ICAO to concur with the findings of the Advisory Joint Appeals Board (AJAB) that Mr. El Sehemawi had not identified an administrative decision capable of being reviewed.

Legal Principle(s)

A neutral first instance process that includes a written decision must exist in order to constitute a decision that is appealable to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT.

Outcome

Case remanded

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.